TT stock benchmarks

Benchmark screenshots for various boosters & machines.
User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4538
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:19 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

TT stock benchmarks

Post by exxos » Wed May 30, 2018 9:18 pm

tt-gembench.jpg
tt-gembench.jpg (742 KiB) Viewed 555 times
ST Medium resolution, no caches
tt-gembench-nocache.jpg
tt-gembench-nocache.jpg (726.9 KiB) Viewed 546 times
TT Medium resolution, with cache
tt-gembench-ttmedium.jpg
tt-gembench-ttmedium.jpg (727.4 KiB) Viewed 546 times
TT Medium resolution, with cache, program in TT-RAM
tt-gembench-ttmedium-fast.jpg
tt-gembench-ttmedium-fast.jpg (718.73 KiB) Viewed 546 times
Images by stephen_usher.
4MB STFM 1.44 FD- VELOCE+ 020 STE - 4MB STE 32MHz - STFM 16MHz - STM - MEGA ST - Falcon 030 CT60 - Atari 2600 - Atari 7800 - Gigafile - SD Floppy Emulator - PeST - HxC - CosmosEx - Ultrasatan - various clutter

https://www.exxoshost.co.uk/atari/ All my hardware guides - mods - games - STOS
https://www.exxoshost.co.uk/atari/last/storenew/ - All my hardware mods for sale - Please help support by making a purchase.

User avatar
Icky
Trusted Guru
Trusted Guru
Posts: 656
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:57 am
Location: UK

Re: TT stock benchmarks

Post by Icky » Wed May 30, 2018 11:48 pm

Stephen - What spec is your TT?

For example which TT-Ram board do you have etc? Just curious as I want to compare against my TT :)

Also once my TT has finished building NetBSD packages I'll run tests on the FPU overclock.

stephen_usher
Posts: 167
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2017 7:19 pm
Location: Oxford, UK.
Contact:

Re: TT stock benchmarks

Post by stephen_usher » Thu May 31, 2018 8:08 am

It's only got Atari memory cards. The Fast-RAM card is a 16MB I bought a "new old stock" a couple of years ago.
Intro retro computers since before they were retro...
ZX81->Spectrum->Memotech MTX->Sinclair QL->520STM->BBC Micro->TT030->PCs & Sun Workstations.
Added code to the MiNT kernel (still there the last time I checked) + put together MiNTOS.
Collection now with added Macs, Amigas, Suns and Acorns.

User avatar
Icky
Trusted Guru
Trusted Guru
Posts: 656
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:57 am
Location: UK

Re: TT stock benchmarks

Post by Icky » Sat Jun 02, 2018 11:15 am

stephen_usher wrote:
Thu May 31, 2018 8:08 am
It's only got Atari memory cards. The Fast-RAM card is a 16MB I bought a "new old stock" a couple of years ago.
Thanks Stephen. I ran the same tests on my TT only difference is I have ST-Ram upgraded to 10MB, the Storm/Thunder TOS with Storm TT-Ram card with 256MB and Thunder-IDE card in the TT. I put the FPU 48MHz overclock back to stock 32MHz.

Looking at the ST-Med Res captures - Most of the stats are identical apart from GEM Window is higher by 56% on your and the Storm card is faster (+120%) for the ALT-RAM test

ST-Med Test
GEMBENCH6-TT-ST-Med-Stock-With-Storm-Card.png
GEMBENCH6-TT-ST-Med-Stock-With-Storm-Card.png (1.39 MiB) Viewed 500 times
TT-Med Test
GEMBENCH6-TT-TT-Med-Stock-With-Storm-Card.png
GEMBENCH6-TT-TT-Med-Stock-With-Storm-Card.png (1.52 MiB) Viewed 500 times

Steve
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 11:49 am

Re: TT stock benchmarks

Post by Steve » Thu Aug 09, 2018 6:14 am

Hey Icky,
My TT has the same configuration as yours and guess what, it gets exactly the same results lol, what a surprise :) I worked out you guys are using the base STFM as the comparison.
Oddly though there seems to be a difference in our FPU benchmark, Stephen and Icky get the same result but I don't. Is my FPU slower or faster I'm not sure how to read the results.

TT w/ 10mb STRAM / 64MB TTRAM STORM / ST MED vs STFM ST MED
IMG_20180809_144248.jpg
IMG_20180809_144248.jpg (1.69 MiB) Viewed 348 times
TT w/ 10mb STRAM / 64MB TTRAM STORM / TT MED vs STFM ST MED
IMG_20180809_145528.jpg
IMG_20180809_145528.jpg (2.04 MiB) Viewed 346 times

User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4538
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:19 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: TT stock benchmarks

Post by exxos » Thu Aug 09, 2018 4:26 pm

FPU test will show 0% because there are no benchmark files using a FPU on a ST. Plus ST FPU is IO mapped which is not supported anyway.. Only proper LINF F FPU supported, IE Falcon.. In which case I think only Falcon as the FPU benchmarks.. This is all explained in the GB6 readme file.
4MB STFM 1.44 FD- VELOCE+ 020 STE - 4MB STE 32MHz - STFM 16MHz - STM - MEGA ST - Falcon 030 CT60 - Atari 2600 - Atari 7800 - Gigafile - SD Floppy Emulator - PeST - HxC - CosmosEx - Ultrasatan - various clutter

https://www.exxoshost.co.uk/atari/ All my hardware guides - mods - games - STOS
https://www.exxoshost.co.uk/atari/last/storenew/ - All my hardware mods for sale - Please help support by making a purchase.

Steve
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 11:49 am

Re: TT stock benchmarks

Post by Steve » Thu Aug 09, 2018 4:57 pm

exxos wrote:
Thu Aug 09, 2018 4:26 pm
FPU test will show 0% because there are no benchmark files using a FPU on a ST. Plus ST FPU is IO mapped which is not supported anyway.. Only proper LINF F FPU supported, IE Falcon.. In which case I think only Falcon as the FPU benchmarks.. This is all explained in the GB6 readme file.
So you're saying that the TT FPU results mean nothing and could be random? And only the Falcon has proper FPU results?

User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4538
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:19 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: TT stock benchmarks

Post by exxos » Thu Aug 09, 2018 5:00 pm

Steve wrote:
Thu Aug 09, 2018 4:57 pm
So you're saying that the TT FPU results mean nothing and could be random? And only the Falcon has proper FPU results?
How can they be random ? all the images above show 0%...

Reference machine even shows "FPU not present" So you can't compare "nothing" to "something", result will always be zero, as it shows in above results.
4MB STFM 1.44 FD- VELOCE+ 020 STE - 4MB STE 32MHz - STFM 16MHz - STM - MEGA ST - Falcon 030 CT60 - Atari 2600 - Atari 7800 - Gigafile - SD Floppy Emulator - PeST - HxC - CosmosEx - Ultrasatan - various clutter

https://www.exxoshost.co.uk/atari/ All my hardware guides - mods - games - STOS
https://www.exxoshost.co.uk/atari/last/storenew/ - All my hardware mods for sale - Please help support by making a purchase.

Steve
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 11:49 am

Re: TT stock benchmarks

Post by Steve » Fri Aug 10, 2018 2:32 am

exxos wrote:
Thu Aug 09, 2018 5:00 pm
Steve wrote:
Thu Aug 09, 2018 4:57 pm
So you're saying that the TT FPU results mean nothing and could be random? And only the Falcon has proper FPU results?
How can they be random ? all the images above show 0%...
Chris I think you misunderstand me, I am not comparing my FPU bench to the stock STFM in the image, I am comparing it to the other TT results above from Icky and Stephen. Theirs show something like 3.xx where as mine is at around 7.xx. Do you see what I mean?

User avatar
exxos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4538
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:19 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: TT stock benchmarks

Post by exxos » Fri Aug 10, 2018 11:55 am

Steve wrote:
Fri Aug 10, 2018 2:32 am
Chris I think you misunderstand me, I am not comparing my FPU bench to the stock STFM in the image, I am comparing it to the other TT results above from Icky and Stephen. Theirs show something like 3.xx where as mine is at around 7.xx. Do you see what I mean?
I would suggest opening a new topic and posting all relevant and relating information to see what's going on...
4MB STFM 1.44 FD- VELOCE+ 020 STE - 4MB STE 32MHz - STFM 16MHz - STM - MEGA ST - Falcon 030 CT60 - Atari 2600 - Atari 7800 - Gigafile - SD Floppy Emulator - PeST - HxC - CosmosEx - Ultrasatan - various clutter

https://www.exxoshost.co.uk/atari/ All my hardware guides - mods - games - STOS
https://www.exxoshost.co.uk/atari/last/storenew/ - All my hardware mods for sale - Please help support by making a purchase.

Post Reply