Not likely. I have the opposite issue anyways. The MMU CPUs work and the ones without them dont. I'll figure it out eventually. just strange.
The original pre_alpha firmware doesnt work?
Moderators: terriblefire, Terriblefire Moderator
Not likely. I have the opposite issue anyways. The MMU CPUs work and the ones without them dont. I'll figure it out eventually. just strange.
Sorry to be thick but where is that on the boardterriblefire wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:14 am Ok. Experiment time.
Could everyone close the MMUDIS jumper and see if that makes a diff. Just want to eliminate the MMU from enquiries.
Hi Alen
Cheers Alenalenppc wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:22 pm Supaduper, that's a software issue. The CPU command cannot distinguish between EC030 and regular 030. So if you issue a CPU FASTROM on an EC030, the command will then report "68030 FASTROM" when queried, but you won't get the desired effect. For example, do a speed test on the IDE. Sysinfo will report about 2 mb/sec without fastrom and over 6.5 mb/sec with fastrom, and the entire system will be a lot more responsive if the fastrom actually works. There will be no change on an EC030.
I don't know how good Sysinfo is at distinguishing between the two CPUs, it could be the same as the CPU command.