Page 1 of 2
Bigger isn't always better
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2018 9:58 am
by rubber_jonnie
For a bit of fun, I snapped the STF remake board on top of the donor C070789 board just to compare.
Huge respect to exxos for the amazing reduction in scale
- Size_Comparison.jpg (440.18 KiB) Viewed 6270 times
Re: Bigger isn't always better
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2018 10:39 am
by exxos
Re: Bigger isn't always better
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2018 10:39 am
by sandord
Ha, there's almost enough space for a second ST
Re: Bigger isn't always better
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2018 10:41 am
by rubber_jonnie
Pretty damn good for a first shot though.
Re: Bigger isn't always better
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2018 10:42 am
by rubber_jonnie
sandord wrote: ↑Wed Oct 31, 2018 10:39 am
Ha, there's most enough space for a second ST
If he can make it smaller,maybe 3, parallel processing STs
Re: Bigger isn't always better
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2018 12:56 pm
by exxos
rubber_jonnie wrote: ↑Wed Oct 31, 2018 10:42 am
If he can make it smaller,maybe 3, parallel processing STs
Did ponder adding a second CPU.. but alas, a lot of work and no software to use it, so idea shelved..
https://www.exxosforum.co.uk/forum/viewt ... =19&t=1242
Re: Bigger isn't always better
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2018 4:06 pm
by JezC
Maybe build in a MSTE or TT instead? Would say a Falcon but that is definitely a step too far
Re: Bigger isn't always better
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2018 4:18 pm
by rubber_jonnie
Re: Bigger isn't always better
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2018 4:28 pm
by exxos
JezC wrote: ↑Wed Oct 31, 2018 4:06 pm
Maybe build in a MSTE or TT instead? Would say a Falcon but that is definitely a step too far
Nah, this machine will beat them all eventually, those machines are pre-obsolete
Re: Bigger isn't always better
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2018 5:26 pm
by JezC
Let's hope so.
I'd love to have a TT-beater for my MIDI setup
